mumble



WWW
 
mumble

home

narratives

poll-mix

about

  email: elect AT
mumble.com.au

Crikey election book chapter

seat 2pp graphs '07

Seats to watch!

Federal pendulum (old)

margins since 1983

Historical results

Margins 1949  2001

See the lemmings!

two decades of Newspolls

state votes at federal elections

Votes and seat
representation
1949 - 2001

Newspoll
preferences


Newspoll &
Morgan graphs

preferential voting

Newspoll Opposition leader approval ratings

Newspoll Opposition voting intentions

 

 

From Crikey 14 November 2007

6. Tipping time: Labor heading for a 30-seat majority

Peter Brent from Mumble Politics writes:

Heard any good election predictions lately? Most pundits have been playing it safe: Labor is favoured to win, they say, but it could go either way. This is of course reasonable, no-one wants to look silly if they're wildly wrong.

As well, anyone who has dealt with media outfits during a campaign knows that all media favor a hung parliament scenario; it just makes for a better story.

The Sunday Age's Jason Koutsoukis recently revisited pundits' calls before the 1996 election.

The general sentiment back then was similar to today's: yes, Howard would probably win, but plenty were not sensing a "strong mood for change", and instead believed it would come down to "a seat or two". Malcolm Mackerras was almost alone in predicting a big result.

This election, Malcolm is going for a 28-seat Labor majority. 

I'm nudging Malcolm up to a 30-seat majority, which would mean Labor holding 90 out of 150 seats. How might those seats fall state by state? Here's a possible combination (all numbers post-redistributions, ie "notional"):

New South Wales: Labor to net nine seats, so increasing their tally from 21 to 30 out of 49. Proportionally, this would be larger than the 24 out of 43 at Bob Hawke's 1983 win, but below the 1993 high water mark of 33 out of 50. [result: gain of 7]

Victoria: a three seat gain, meaning they end up with 22 out of 37. This would be less than their 1983 result (23 out of 33) but similar to 1987 (25 out of 39). [result: gain of 2]

Queensland: a 10 seat gain for Labor. Don't laugh, it would still only take them to 16 out of 29 - a little over half the seats. In 1990 they got 15 out of 24 Queensland seats with only 50.2 of the two party preferred vote. [Result: 9 seat gain.]

Western Australia: two (net) extra seats for Labor, taking them to seven out of 15. [result: one seat net loss.]

South Australia: three seat gain to Labor, taking them to six out of 11. [result: 3 seat gain.]

Tasmania: two seat gain, so Labor holds five out of five, as they did from 1998 to 2004. [result: 2 seat gain]

ACT and Northern Territory: one extra seat, Solomon (NT). [result: as predicted.]

Which actual seats would fall? That's too difficult. On the experience of past elections, a national swing of, say, seven percent would probably include some seat components about twice that size, with others, perhaps, moving a little to the government. And if those double digit swings are in the right electorates - prepare for the unexpected.

That seven percent swing would put Labor on about 54 to 46 two party preferred, and plotting it against the Mackerras pendulum also takes you to the same result: about a 30-seat gain.

external links
these open new windows

Electoral Commissions
Federal
NSW
    Vic 
Qld WA SA
 
Tas ACT NT
ECA


Parliaments
Federal
NSW
    Vic 
Qld WA SA
 
Tas ACT NT

Electoral

Antony Green (ABC)
Adam Carr
Bullring
Crikey 
Simon Jackman  
Oz politics
Poll bludger
Possums Pollytics
Peter Tucker
Upper House

Other

Inside Story
Enrolling the People
Crikey blog
Piping Shrike
Andrew Leigh
Rick Hasen (US)
Oxfam Shop
Australian Constitution
Australian Policy Online
Democratic Audit
Nicholson cartoons
 -
animations
Online opinion
Morgan

WA Uni
election database

Distance Learning

Yarrh wines