Western Sydney being Mark Latham territory, everyone
was on their best behaviour and nobody got decked. Crean reminded
journalists that this had been his first port of call upon becoming
Opposition Leader, the gang had certainly all been out there taking
notes, and they would be returning again many times, don't you worry
about that.
Got it? The ALP is all ears for Sydney's west, and you can
probably recite the reasons off by heart. They go like this: John
Howard has captured the Labor heartland. Like the American "Reagan
Democrats" of the 1980s, these working-class folk find comfort in
the Howard mix of social conservatism and economic liberalism.
Western Sydney is now "strongly Liberal", the next election will be
won or lost there, and so Labor had better get back to basics
quickly if it is to regain the so-called battlers.
But hang on, the plot thickens, because an exotic new creature
has been seen roaming the suburbs – the "aspirational voter"
(hereafter called AV). Many claim to know it intimately but pictures
are rare and fuzzy. Some seem to use it as just a new phrase for
battler, while others construct a related but distinct species with
its own special needs.
So that everyone hasn't been talking complete twaddle for three
years, let's assume it is indeed a discrete entity: a battler made
good, perhaps. Probably that self-employed neighbour who's always in
the yard, extending this, laying that, with a four-wheel drive or
two in the garage.
Battlers and AVs share a disdain for trendy middle-class issues,
but on matters economic they part ways. AVs like nothing better than
a tax cut and low interest rates, while battlers would still
appreciate a helping hand – maybe in the form of Latham's share
scheme.
Got all that? This is the dilemma facing the federal ALP. The
story of Howard's Battlers is a great yarn and generates bountiful
copy. Unfortunately, a great load of twaddle is what it is.
Get yourself an electoral map of Sydney. Draw a line from
Sydney's Town Hall out to Penrith, down to Campbelltown and back in
again. You've got a triangle containing every seat that could
remotely be classified Sydney's west. There are 16 in all, 13 of
them still in Labor hands, notwithstanding last year's "debacle".
And an extra three seats does not a victory make.
Labor has never gotten over losing Parramatta and Lindsay in 1996
(Macarthur was always fickle), but they should. The 1996 census
figures had these three topping the gang of 16 in median income. Six
years on, the gap has probably widened. These are not battlers. The
love has died, Labor. Get over it.
It was not just Sydney but the whole of NSW that polled poorly
last year. This relative underperformance was due to six years of
NSW Premier Bob Carr, and while he's around, things won't improve.
The last time NSW unloaded a state ALP administration (1988), it
went to the next federal poll and swung to federal Labor to the tune
of 2 per cent while the rest of the country went 2 per cent the
other way.
So listen, Labor, get a grip on yourself. Some would call this
stalking. They're not worth it, try your luck in other states.
Peter Brent is editor of mumble.com.au.